
Daniel H. Teitelbaum, M.D.
Assistant Professor of Surgery
Section of Pediatric Surgery
University of Michigan Medical School and the C. S. Mott Children's
Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Arnold G. Coran, M.D.
Professor of Surgery
Head, Section of Pediatric Surgery
University of Michigan Medical School
Surgeon-in-Chief, C. S. Mott Children's Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Despite major improvements in the understanding of the pathophysiology and genetics of Hirschsprung's disease, little advancement has occurred in either elucidating the etiology of Hirschsprung's-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) or its prevention. Despite the recognition of this process in Harald Hirschsprung's first description of the disease in 1886, little attention was given to this disease process for the next 70 years (1). Swenson and Fisher, in 1956, were the first to recognize the association of enterocolitis and Hirschsprung's disease (2). Over the past four decades, HAEC has been a major cause of morbidity and mortality in infants and children with Hirschsprung's disease. With an increased understanding of the mucosal defense mechanisms, a host of potential causative factors have been advanced to explain this disease process. This review will attempt to sort out what is known clinically about this disorder and will review potential etiologies and therapy of HAEC.
Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
Bill and Chapman were the first to accurately characterize the clinical
aspects of HAEC (3). They speculated that the cause of this disorder was a
partial mechanical obstruction similar to the colitis associated with
other forms of bowel obstruction. Their description of the natural history
of the process helped to alert physicians to the high risk of HAEC in
Hirschsprung's disease patients. The classic clinical manifestations that
they described in HAEC include abdominal distention, fever and foul
smelling stool (3). There is, however, a wide range of clinical
presentations of HAEC. A compilation of symptoms from patients with HAEC,
treated at our Children's Hospital, noted the following in decreasing
frequency: abdominal distension, explosive diarrhea, vomiting, fever,
lethargy, rectal bleeding and shock (4). Many cases of diarrhea or
abdominal distention may be mistakenly diagnosed as a gastroenteritis or
the obstructing sphincter syndrome; however, most of these are cases of
mild HAEC. To facilitate the diagnosis of HAEC, Elhalaby, et al developed
a clinical grading system (Table 1) based on
several clinical criteria (5). An occasional case of HAEC may present as a
perforation of the bowel proximal to the aganglionic segment (6, 7).
The diagnosis of HAEC is typically based on the classic presentation of a neonate with a history of constipation starting in the newborn period, followed by abdominal distention and liquid, foul-smelling stool. Examination will show a markedly distended abdomen which is hyperesonant to percussion. Rectal examination often results in an explosive discharge of gas and stool. Post-pullthrough HAEC may present in a very similar fashion and is typically seen within the first two years following the child's pullthrough (8). Abdominal radiographs may be quite helpful. The proximal colon is distended with an almost toxic megacolon appearance (Lellie, 1997 Holschnier). An extremely useful finding is what we term a 'cut-off sign' in the recto-sigmoid region (Figure 1A) with an absence of air distally (4). This sign can be seen in all forms of HAEC and was noted in 74% of patients during an HAEC episode compared to only 14% of the time in-between episodes of HAEC. Other common findings were small bowel dilatation in 74% and multiple air-fluid levels in 79%. Occasionally, pneumatosis intestinalis may be seen (4, 9). Because of the risk of perforation, a contrast enema should not be done in the presence of clinical HAEC. However, it is not uncommon to see findings of subclinical HAEC during such radiologic studies (Figure 1B). Typically, an irregular mucosal lining, with a resultant 'sawtooth' appearance is seen.
The timing of HAEC and the clinical course of Hirschsprung's disease shows that the two times an infant is at highest risk for the development of HAEC is either before the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease has been made, or following the definitive pullthrough. Although occasionally described, HAEC is distinctly uncommon in those patients with a decompressing colostomy (10). The diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease after the first week of life places the neonate at a substantially higher risk for the development of HAEC (11). In this report, the mean age at diagnosis of neonates with Hirschsprung's disease was 16.6 days in those who developed HAEC and 4.6 days in those neonates without HAEC. Post-pullthrough HAEC may be due to associated internal sphincter spasm which is commonly associated with Hirschsprung's disease and may act to functionally obstruct the passage of stool (12). Although the course of enterocolitis is usually most severe in those infants who have not yet had the diagnosis of enterocolitis made, a recent report describes the death of 5 infants due to HAEC anywhere from 3 weeks to 20 months after their pullthrough procedure (13).
Incidence and Associated Risk Factors
The incidence of HAEC varies widely among reported series. Table 3 lists
the incidence of HAEC in several large series. The mean incidence was 25%,
but the range was quite wide (from 17% to50%) and may represent
differences in the manner in which HAEC is diagnosed. This is perhaps most
evident by the large variation in mortality rates in two of the largest
series of Hirschsprung's disease patients (14, 15). In a review of the
Surgical Section of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Kleinhaus reported
a low rate of HAEC, but a high mortality rate. Whereas in a review of
Japanese cases of Hirschsprung's disease, Ikeda noted a high rate of HAEC,
but a low mortality rate (14, 15). Additionally, a clear decline in the
incidence has occurred over the past 40 years with improved and more
prompt diagnosis of the disease as demonstrated by the 50% incidence of
HAEC in Bill and Chapman's series, and the much lower incidence
(Table 3) in more recent series (3).
Several factors have been associated with an increased incidence of enterocolitis. As stated above, one fairly well substantiated risk factor is a delay in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease (10, 11). Others have claimed that once an infant develops HAEC, they are at increased risk to develop other enterocolitic episodes in the future (16). Although some have speculated that early development of HAEC may somehow alter the defense mechanisms of the intestine and predispose the patient to recurrent episodes of HAEC, many other investigators have not found such a predisposition (11, 17, 18).
Increased length of the aganglionic segment has also been associated with the development of HAEC (8, 14, 15, 19). Intuitively, if the disease process is complicated by the degree of obstruction, longer lengths of aganglionosis should be associated with a higher incidence of HAEC. However, others have failed to find such an association (10, 11, 17, 18).
Infants with Trisomy 21 appear to be at increased risk of developing HAEC (20). In one series on HAEC, almost 45% of infants with Trisomy 21 and Hirschsprung's disease developed HAEC (11). This association of Trisomy 21 and HAEC has been confirmed in subsequent series (10, 18, 21). More than likely, this association is due to an immune deficiency, both humoral and cellular, which probably predisposes these infants to HAEC (22-24).
Other associated anomalies may place the infant at risk for the development of enterocolitis. Caneiro found that 53% of infants with associated anomalies developed HAEC compared to 26% with Hirschsprung's disease alone (18). Elhalaby noted that 47% of infants with anomalies developed HAEC compared to 29% without (4). It is not clear if this association is due to the large number of patients with Down's Syndrome; and, unfortunately, neither author adequately analyzed this data by separating out patients with Trisomy 21.
Post-Pullthrough Enterocolitis
Rates of post pullthrough enterocolitis vary widely among series
(Table 4), ranging from 2% to 27%. In the two
largest series, a significantly higher incidence of enterocolitis was
noted in those patients undergoing the Swenson pull-through. This higher
incidence was noted in Swenson's own review from 1975, and this may be due
to the inclusion of several patients who underwent this pull-through in
the earlier years of the Swenson procedure, prior to it being modified to
a more distal anastomosis. Post-operative enterocolitis has been
associated with a fairly high rate of mortality in several series. In
fact, when examining those deaths due to Hirschsprung's disease, several
series noted that approximately 50% of deaths resulted from complications
directly related to an enterocolitic episode.
Pathology
The gross pathologic description of HAEC is probably best given by Harald Hirschsprung's first report of the
disease itself (25). The following is a quote from his description of the
lesion:
'...in the second case separate larger and deeper ulcerations that penetrate to the serosa, and indications of peritonitis can be seen on the serosal surface. Near the larger ulceration, we find an abscess under the mucosa that measures 2 cm...Mottled spaces can be seen in the submucosa containing pus.'
Like many other inflammatory disease processes of the intestine, HAEC is manifested by the appearance of neutrophils within the crypts of the intestine. A careful analysis of the natural progression of this disease process shows several discrete phases which can be used to grade the pathologic severity of the enterocolitic process. A grading system is shown in Table 2. The system goes from a grade 0 with no pathologic abnormality to grade I which shows a marked amount of mucus streaming from the crypts of the intestine (Figure 3A). This mucin retention is a histopathologic process unique to only two diseases, Hirschsprung's and cystic fibrosis. Though not absolute, the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease is suggested based on this finding alone from a suction rectal biopsy, even without sufficient submucosa. Subsequent grades of HAEC show a progressive increase in crypt abscesses (Figure 3B), followed by the destruction of the intestinal epithelium and eventual perforation of the bowel. The latter 3 grades may look quite similar to ulcerative colitis. Our own group, and others, have had occasional difficulty in differentiating between HAEC and ulcerative colitis (26, 27). Although there are reports of an ischemic enterocolitis as a complication of Hirschsprung's disease, this finding is unusual (28). In a report by Teich, et al, all four of the cases described involved extremely ill neonates who were in septic shock, and this low perfusion state may have been the actual cause of the ischemic findings. Others have reported the association of necrotizing enterocolitis and HAEC in the same patients based on the radiologic finding of pneumatosis intestinalis (18). This radiologic finding, however, can be non-specific and does not necessarily indicate the child has necrotizing enterocolitis.
Morbidity and Mortality
The morbidity and mortality associated with the development of HAEC is
quite high. Hospitalizations for many of these infants can be complicated
and lengthy. Caneiro noted that hospitalizations ranged from 6 to 29 days
(mean 13 days) (18). The cost of caring for an infant with HAEC is over
two and one-half times as high as that for an infant with Hirschsprung's
disease and no enterocolitis (11). Certainly in this era of cost
containment, the ability to avoid such a complication is particularly
critical. In addition to morbidity, mortality may also occur. Although
death is generally an uncommon complication of HAEC, many series include
reports of infants dying of the disease, and in many they comprise the
majority of all deaths due to Hirschsprung's disease (Table 4). Mortality
rates range from 0% to 33%; again most likely reflecting differences in
the way in which HAEC is diagnosed (Table 3). Mortality rates also appear
to be due to associated factors such as Trisomy 21.
Potential Causes
An appreciation of the pathologic changes in HAEC allows for
consideration of potential pathophysiologic processes which could cause
this disease. Historically, Swenson and Fisher postulated that the
disorder was due to a defect in water and electrolyte metabolism (2).
Subsequently, Swenson revised this concept and stated that improper fluid
absorption was actually the result of chronic constipation (26). Several
more recent theories on the etiology of HAEC have since been proposed
including: infectious, ischemic, obstructive, as well as hypersentivity
reactive causes (29). Below potential contributing factors for the
development of HAEC are discussed.
Treatment
In 1964, Swenson suggested that the treatment of HAEC should be rectal
tube decompression (2). Rectal washouts should be the initial approach in
the care of a child, regardless of age, who presents with HAEC. The
technique consists of the use of a soft red rubber catheter (at least 16
Fr) with multiple side holes cut to facilitate drainage. The catheter
should be gently advanced (often as saline is flowing) above the
aganglionic level. After catheter advancement, gas and stool should be
aspirated, followed by repetitive irrigations of 20 to 30 ml of saline,
followed by removal of the tube. The procedure should be repeated every 4
to 6 hours until the child is decompressed. Importantly, enemas without a
decompressing tube, should be avoided as they may worsen the
enterocolitis. Not uncommonly, this treatment alone can often alleviate an
even a fairly high grade enterocolitis.
Along with washouts, intravenous antibiotics or, in mild cases, oral metronidazole should also be used. Should the disease process fail to improve or the infant deteriorate, consideration should be given, in a neonate, to the performance of a leveling colostomy. This typically occurs in infants with long segment disease where rectal washouts cannot reach the dilated proximal bowel (47).
Recently, rectal irrigations have been used in a prophylactic fashion after the definitive pullthrough procedure (48). In this report, a significant reduction in the number of patients who developed enterocolitis was noted. It is possible that the washouts served to decompress the intestine for the first few months after the pullthrough procedure or may have served to either prevent colonic distention or washout enteropathogenic organism in the colonic lumen.
If repeated bouts of enterocolitis persist after the definitive pullthrough procedure, then an investigation into a mechanical cause should be undertaken. This should start with a contrast enema to insure that there is no obstruction in the neo-rectum, a potentially correctable cause (11). If this is normal, a suction rectal biopsy should be performed to rule out retention of an excess amount of aganglionic bowel as well as other possible etiologies such as IND (46, 49). Should these biopsies be normal, as is usually the case, consideration should be given to the performance of a posterior anal myotomy or myectomy. Published experience with this technique by several groups has demonstrated it to be safe and have a very low to absent incidence of fecal incontinence (50, 51). This more recent experience, however, is in contrast to a relatively poor experience with the procedure by Swenson who felt it did not benefit many of his patients (8). Polley, et al performed 3 internal sphincterotomies in 8 patients with persistent enterocolitis and Marty, et al performed 8 in 37 patients with post-pullthrough enterocolitis (52, 53). Overall, results of these internal sphincterotomies are quite good; however, both of these authors advocate a significant period of conservative therapy, since most patients with post-pullthrough enterocolitis will improve over time.
Conclusions
The development of enterocolitis in patients with Hirschsprung's disease
remains a perplexing problem. Clearly recognition of this problem is
essential to either its prevention or to early intervention in its
treatment.
Table 1. Clinical grading system for Hirschsprung's-associated enterocolitis.
|
Grade |
Pathologic findings |
|---|---|
| I | Mild explosive diarrhea, mild or moderate abdominal distension, and no systemic manifestations |
| II | Moderate explosive diarrhea, moderate to severe abdominal distention, mild systemic symptoms |
| III | Severe explosive diarrhea, marked abdominal distention, shock or impending shock |
Table 2. Pathologic grading of Hirschsprung's-associated enterocolitis.
|
Grade |
Pathologic findings |
|---|---|
| 0 | Normal mucosa |
| I | Crypt dilatation, mucin retention |
| II | Cryptitis or < 2 crypt abscesses/HPF |
| III | Multiple crypt abscesses/HPF |
| IV | Fibrinopurulent debris and mucosal ulceration |
| V | Transluminal necrosis or perforation |
Table 3. Incidence of Enterocolitis in several reported series of Hirschsprung's disease (3, 8, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17-19, 54).
Report |
Overall | Trisomy 21 | Incidence of Long segment | Pre-pullthrough | MX* |
Kleinhaus |
18% | ns | 25% | 15% | 30% |
Ikeda |
ns | ns | 44.3% | 29.2%(24.3 to 44.3) | 1.8-2.4% |
Teitelbaum |
24% | 46% | 29% | 16% | 16% |
Elhalaby |
33.9% | 37.5% | 55% | not stated | 0% |
Rescorla |
18% | 26% | 32% | 6% | 9% |
Caneiro |
32% | 50% | not different | 16% | 4% |
Bill |
50% | ns | 66% | 45% | 33% |
Foster |
17% | ns | 5% | 10% | 0% |
Surana |
30% | 47% | 38% | 13% | 10 |
*Mortality (Mx) due to enterocolitis is based on the total
number of infants with enterocolitis.
Go Back to Text
Table 4. Enterocolitis (HAEC) post-pullthrough from several large series of Hirschsprung's disease (11, 12, 14, 15, 52, 53, 55-59).
Report |
Type of Pullthrough | Incidence of Enterocolitis | HAEC needing Surgery | Percent of deaths due to post pullthrough enterocolitis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Kleinhaus |
Mix1 | RPT 2% Duhamel 6% Swenson 16% |
none | 75% |
Rehbein |
Rehbein | 0% | none | |
Holschneider |
Mix | ERPT | ||
Chapter |
13.2% Duhamel 4.7% Swenson 3.7% Rehbein 6.3% |
none | ||
Teitelbaum |
Duhamel | 6.3% | 60% | 0% |
Ihezue |
ERPT2 | 7.4% | none | |
Swenson |
Swenson | 21% | none | 46% |
Marty |
Mix | 27% | 22% | 71% |
Harrison |
Mix | 12% | none | 10% |
Polley |
ERPT | 16% | 38% | 0% |
Ikeda |
Mix | ERPT 12% Duhamel 14% Swenson 34% |
none | |
Elhallaby |
ERPT | 21.4% | 16% | 0% |
1 - Many different types of pullthroughs
2 - Endorectal pullthrough
Go Back to Text
Figure Legend
Figure 1. Roengenographic evidence of enterocolitis.
Figure 2. Gross appearance of the colonic mucosal lining of a patient with severe HAEC.
Figure 3. Histologic appearance of HAEC
Figure 4. Schematic summary of the potential mechanisms involved in the development of HAEC.
References